This website is co-ordinated by organisations concerned about the market-distorting power of the major supermarkets. The information is intended for educational and public awareness purposes. The co-ordinating organisations  do so in their individual capacities and only in relation to their own particular areas of expertise, and are not responsible for materials produced and actions taken by other organisations.
The book " Tescopoly" by Andrew Simms has been written and published independently and is not endorsed by the Tescopoly Alliance. It should not be mistaken as an official publication of the Tescopoly Alliance and campaign. 
Farmers

Picture credit: Friends of the Earth
Picture credit: Friends of the Earth
"Having travelled to many countries to meet farmers it was very clear that supermarkets treated all farmers equally  - unfortunately that is equally badly and it was the name of Tesco which came up time and time again. If we are to have a future as farmers and sustainable agriculture then we need to control supermarket power." Michael Hart, chairman of Small and Family Farms Alliance



Farmers have to bear the burden of unfair trading practices imposed by supermarkets. In 2001, Tony Blair claimed that British supermarkets had farmers in an 'armlock'. Supermarkets control nearly 80% of the British grocery market and as the most powerful players along most food supply chains are able to dictate terms, conditions and prices to suppliers. If suppliers complain, supermarkets can simply move their business elsewhere, and their dominance of the food retail sector is such that there may simply be no one else for farmers to sell their produce to. 

In 2000, the UK Competition Commission (CC) reported on many of the supermarkets' unfair practices which were considered anti-competitive. It found 52 kinds of abusive trading practicies (See the CC report). The response by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) was to introduce a voluntary code of practice, to be entered into by the large four supermarkets. Many of the 12 original provisions recommended by the Competition Commission were weakened. A later review by the OFT revealed that many practices identified in 2000 were still occurring, and a survey of farmers conducted by Friends of the Earth in 2003 showed that many farmers were 'being asked to pay a rebate on an agreed price, waiting over 30 days for an invoice to be paid, incurring additional transport or packaging costs due to changes in supermarket specifications and meeting the costs of unsold or wasted products where quality of the product was not an issue'.

For further information on the Supermarket Code of Practice, please see the Tescopoly page.

Supermarkets fail to pay farmers a fair share of  retail prices
Thousands of farmers and workers are forced to leave the industry each year because of the low prices they receive for their produce. Farmers' organisations believe that a major contributory factor to this crisis in British farming is the increasing buying power of supermarkets and their ability to squeeze suppliers. According to the 2000 Competition Commission Report the buying power of the major supermarkets actually means that 'the burden of cost increases in the supply chain has fallen disproportionately heavily on small suppliers such as farmers'.

Supermarket buying power means that a supermarket like Tesco can obtain more favourable terms than other buyers. For example, the Competition Commission investigation revealed that Tesco consistently paid suppliers nearly 4% below the average price paid by other retailers. However when a supermarket squeezes its supplier, it merely reallocates profit margin from supplier to retailer and there should be no assumption that the retailer's saving will be shared with consumers.

Some further reading on the impact of supermarkets on farming:

 
Alliance members